Can you find a rational number which when
multiplied by itself (square) gives 4 ?
You know the answer is 2. i.e. √4 = 2
What is the rational number whose square is 9⁄25 ?
As you know (3⁄5) x (3⁄5) = 9⁄25,
the answer is 3⁄5. i.e. √(9⁄25) = 3⁄5.
Example 1
Now I ask you another question,
Can you find a rational number whose square is 2 ?
In other words, Is √2 a rational number ?
If √2 is rational,
let it be equal to a⁄b where a and b(≠0) are integers.
Let us say a⁄b reduced to
the simplest form be p⁄q,
which means p and q are integers which
do not have common factors other than 1.
√2 = p⁄q
⇒ (√2)2 = (p⁄q)2
⇒ 2 = p2⁄q2
⇒p2 = 2q2
⇒ p2 is divisible by 2.
⇒ p is divisible by 2.-----(i)
Since p is divisible by 2,
we can take p = 2r where r is an integer.
Substituting this in p2 = 2q2, we get
(2r)2 = 2q2
⇒ 4r2 = 2q2
⇒q2 = 2r2
⇒ q2 is divisible by 2.
⇒ q is divisible by 2.-----(ii)
From (i) and (ii), p and q have common factor 2.
But p and q do not have any common factor other than 1.
This contradiction has arisen because of our assumption
that √2 is a rational number.
So, we conclude that √2 is not a rational number.
Thus there is a need for extending the rational numbers.
Can Movies be Learning Tools ?
Do you know Movies provide us
Entertainment, Social interaction,
Laughing Therapy, Learning Tool,
Relaxation, General Well Being ?
We first take the statement that
√3 is rational
and prove that the statement is wrong.
Let √3 be rational,
Let it be equal to a⁄b where a and b(≠0) are integers.
Let us say a⁄b reduced to
the simplest form be p⁄q,
which means p and q are integers which
do not have common factors other than 1.
√3 = p⁄q
⇒ (√3)2 = (p⁄q)2
⇒ 3 = p2⁄q2
⇒p2 = 3q2
⇒ p2 is divisible by 3.
⇒ p is divisible by 3.-----(i)
Since p is divisible by 3,
we can take p = 3r where r is an integer.
Substituting this in p2 = 3q2, we get
(3r)2 = 3q2
⇒ 9r2 = 3q2
⇒q2 = 3r2
⇒ q2 is divisible by 3.
⇒ q is divisible by 3.-----(ii)
From (i) and (ii), p and q have common factor 3.
But p and q do not have any common factor other than 1.
This contradiction has arisen because of our assumption
that √3 is a rational number.
Examples of irrational numbers which are not surds
(i) Example of irrational number which is not a surd is
π, which is defined as the ratio
of circumference and diameter of a circle.
The value of π = 3.1416.... which is a
non-terminating and non-repeating decimal.
We some times take π = 22⁄7 which
is only an approximate value of π.
(ii) Another Example of irrational number which is
not a surd is e, the base of natural logarithm.
e is defined as the sum of the infinite series
e = 1 + 1⁄1! + 1⁄2! + 1⁄3! + 1⁄4! + .....
where, ! stands for factorial
(n! = product of natural numbers from 1 upto n)
The value of e = 2.71828.... which is a
non-terminating and non-repeating decimal.
Rationalising Factors
If the product of two irrational numbers is
a rational number, then each of the irrationals
is called a rationalising factor of the other.
Examples :
(i) √5
x √5
= 5, so √5
is the rationalising factor of
√5.
(ii) (√3
+ √2)
x (√3
- √2)
= [(√3)2
- (√2)2]
= 3 - 2 = 1 which is rational.
So, (√3
+ √2)
and (√3
- √2)
are rationalising factors of each other.
(iii) (6 + √5)
x (6 - √5)
= 62 - (√5)2
= 36 - 5 = 31 which is rational.
So, (6 + √5)
and (6 - √5)
are rationalising factors of each other.
Rationalisation of Denominator of a Fraction
Multiplying the numerator and denominator of
the fraction by the rationalising factor of
the denominator and then simplifying is called
Rationalisation of the Denominator of a Fraction.
Example 3 of Irrational Numbers
Rationalise the denominators of each of the following.
(i) 2⁄√6
(ii) 3⁄(3 + √7)
(iii) 16⁄(√11
- √3)
Solution:
(i) 2⁄√6
= (2 x √6)
⁄(√6
x √6)
= (2 x √6)
⁄6
= √6⁄3. Ans.
(ii) 3⁄(8 + √7)
= [3 x (3 - √7)]
⁄[(3 + √7)
x (3 - √7)]
= [3 x (3 - √7)]
⁄[(32 - √7)2]
= [3 x (3 - √7)]
⁄[(9 - 7)]
= 3(3 - √7)⁄2. Ans.